Skip to content

Glossary

Ordinary Course of Business

An M&A covenant requiring the target to operate normally between signing and closing, avoiding unusual actions that could diminish the business value being acquired.

What Is Ordinary Course of Business?

The ordinary course of business covenant is a contractual obligation in M&A definitive agreements requiring the target company to conduct its operations in the normal, day-to-day manner between signing and closing. The covenant protects the buyer by ensuring the business it negotiated to acquire remains substantially unchanged during the interim period — no unusual contracts, no extraordinary expenditures, no material changes to the workforce, and no actions outside the company’s regular operating patterns.

The ordinary course covenant is the buyer’s primary protection against interim value erosion. Without it, the seller could take actions between signing and closing that diminish the business — distributing excess cash, taking on unusual liabilities, or entering into unfavourable contracts — while the buyer is locked into the agreed purchase price.

Standard Covenant Structure

General Covenant

The agreement typically contains a broad general covenant:

“From signing until closing, the Company shall conduct its business in the ordinary course consistent with past practice in all material respects.”

Specific Restrictions

The general covenant is supplemented by a list of specific actions that require buyer consent:

CategoryRestricted Actions
CapitalIssuing shares, declaring dividends, redeeming stock
DebtBorrowing money, granting security interests, assuming guarantees
AssetsSelling, leasing, or disposing of material assets outside the ordinary course
EmployeesHiring senior personnel, increasing compensation, granting bonuses, amending benefit plans
ContractsEntering into, amending, or terminating material contracts
Capital expenditureMaking expenditures above an agreed threshold
LitigationSettling material claims or proceedings
TaxMaking or changing tax elections, filing amended returns
IPLicensing, transferring, or encumbering intellectual property
AcquisitionsMaking acquisitions or investments

The buyer’s consent to restricted actions is typically:

  • Required in writing
  • “Not to be unreasonably withheld, conditioned, or delayed” (from the seller’s perspective)
  • Subject to a deemed consent if the buyer does not respond within a specified period (e.g., 5 business days)

Negotiation Dynamics

Seller’s Concerns

The ordinary course covenant constrains the seller’s ability to manage the business actively during the interim period. Sellers negotiate for:

  • Materiality qualifiers — only “material” deviations from ordinary course are restricted
  • Specific carve-outs — actions that the seller knows it will need to take (seasonal inventory purchases, planned capital projects, contract renewals)
  • Reasonable consent standard — buyer cannot unreasonably withhold consent
  • Emergency exceptions — actions required to respond to competitive threats, regulatory requirements, or emergencies

Buyer’s Concerns

Buyers seek broad ordinary course covenants to preserve the business in its current state:

  • No materiality qualifier — even small changes can cumulatively erode value
  • Specific prohibitions — enumerate every category of restricted action
  • Sole discretion consent — buyer has absolute discretion to approve or deny
  • Information rights — regular reporting on business operations during the interim period

COVID-19 and Ordinary Course

The pandemic forced a re-examination of ordinary course covenants. Targets operating under COVID restrictions took extraordinary actions — furloughing employees, closing facilities, renegotiating leases, drawing down credit facilities — that arguably violated their ordinary course obligations. Key lessons:

  • Pandemic carve-outs are now standard in interim operating covenants
  • Courts have interpreted “ordinary course” with reference to what is reasonable under prevailing conditions, not just historical norms
  • The AB Stable VIII v. Maps Hotels & Resorts (2020) Delaware Court of Chancery decision found that pandemic-related actions could constitute an ordinary course breach, highlighting the importance of specific carve-outs

According to the American Bar Association’s Private Target M&A Deal Points Study, virtually all US private M&A agreements (98%+) include ordinary course of business covenants, with an average of 15-25 specifically enumerated restrictions.

APAC Context

Australia — ordinary course covenants in Australian M&A follow UK-influenced patterns. In schemes of arrangement, the scheme implementation deed includes conduct of business covenants that restrict the target’s operations between signing and the scheme meeting. The Takeovers Panel provides guidance on the reasonableness of interim restrictions.

Hong Kong — the Takeovers Code contains general principles requiring the target board not to take frustrating actions during an offer, which overlaps with (but is distinct from) contractual ordinary course covenants. In private M&A, Hong Kong agreements include detailed ordinary course provisions modelled on UK and US practice.

Japan — ordinary course covenants in Japanese M&A may be less detailed than in Western practice, reflecting the cultural norm of business continuity and the expectation that the target’s management will act responsibly during the interim period. However, as deal documentation becomes more internationalised, Japanese agreements increasingly include US-style enumerated restrictions.

“The ordinary course covenant is the buyer’s insurance policy against interim value destruction,” observes Daniel Bae, founder of Amafi. “In APAC deals, the specific restrictions must be calibrated to the target’s business — a one-size-fits-all covenant can either over-constrain operations or leave gaps that allow value leakage.”


Managing M&A deal execution across Asia Pacific? Amafi helps structure transaction terms and interim protections. Learn more.

Related Terms

Related Articles